Showing posts with label spider-man. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spider-man. Show all posts

Thursday, March 13, 2025

Mego Key Parties

 Based on these photos found in some recent eBay auctions, there must have been some crazy Mego key parties going on in the swingin' '70s! 






Monday, May 20, 2024

Pops Saw a Movie: MADAME WEB

 When I saw that MADAME WEB had dropped on Netflix, I got way too excited. As much as I dislike rubberneckers, I just had to experience this train wreck of a film for myself. I say this as a superhero nerd who—like all of you—is suffering superhero movie fatigue. But this is the first time that THE MOVIE ITSELF exhibits symptoms of said malady, to the point of almost completely excising superheroics in favor of a lot of scenes of running away from things.

MADAME WEB is one of Sony’s flailing attempts to milk their rights to the Spider-Man universe (following two Venom films and MORBIUS, along with the upcoming KRAVEN THE HUNTER), loosely basing this film on a handful of Marvel Comics characters, including the titular Cassandra Webb. In the comics, Madame Web is an old lady, but of course, the movie has to make her an attractive young woman (played by Dakota Johnson). Stir in three different teenage girls who will one day become their own distinct Spider-Woman (all before Peter Parker becomes Spider-Man, apparently), an obscure Spidey villain, and a young Uncle Ben as a paramedic, and you’ve got box office gold! Er, lead.

What little plot exists here (after much reported rewriting) is serviceable, I guess, but the whole endeavor is so rote, so weighed down with movie clichés (the overly art-directed journal, the pristine, un-gooey newborn baby, distracting product placement, the sassy black girl who’s flippant in the face of danger, to name a few), shitty CGI, and cardboard performances that absolutely nothing sticks. That’s a spider metaphor, and about as clever as anything in the movie.

If MADAME WEB can have any kind of legacy, perhaps it’s that no movie has ever better laid bare the fact that filmmaking is, to the bulk of its participants both in front of and behind the camera, just a job. Not every actor gives a shit about the story or has any connection to the character (Dakota Johnson notoriously couldn’t name one recent SPIDER-MAN movie, and may have thought her film was part of the “actual” MCU). And that’s fine. Nobody’s pretending that MADAME WEB is art. But it fails even as product (despite the constant presence of Pepsi imagery).

MADAME WEB is just lazy. It’s another movie with no opening credits (the title drops in the midst of a “Marvel” production logo that includes not one recognizable character, and even a full card at the end flashes for a half a second, as if the film is embarrassed by itself), that drops pop culture references (shitty ones at that) to wake the audience up and remind them that this is a period piece (it’s set in 2003, despite a ton of anachronisms), that tries to be clever by slightly altering familiar tag lines (“When you take on the responsibility, great power will come” … no, seriously), that reuses visual gags such as broken windows that splinter like spider webs so Dakota Johnson can pose behind them.

It’s kind of amazing to me to think that there was a time not so long ago that as a card-carrying fanboy, I felt obligated to not just see, but OWN every superhero movie that was produced, even ones I didn’t like (eg, BATMAN & ROBIN and DAREDEVIL). I think I realized that endeavor was not only pointless, but unsustainable by the time Andrew Garfield’s THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN came out in 2012. But I never dreamed that the day would come where there’d be SO MUCH OF THIS STUFF that not only would I not want to see all of it, but I’d wish it would stop. Or at the very least, stop being squirted out with all the creative care of a chicken McNugget.

Thursday, October 08, 2020

The Pops Gallery: Protest Comic Book Covers!

Hey, it's 2020! The year of Covid-19, the Trumpocalypse, and multiple very important protest marches and movements. I present this gallery of Protest-themed comic book covers from the late Silver and Early Bronze Ages of Comics not dismissively (although some of these are pretty dismissive), but as a historical flashback to the last time that protests were a big part of American culture. It's interesting to note that the seemingly apolitical Archie Comics dominates this list with a range of protest issues that go from farcical to serious (avoiding the Vietnam War and Civil Rights, sadly). But hey, at least they're more serious than that Batman cover! Sheesh! 































Sunday, July 01, 2018

The Pops Gallery: Hey!! Kids!!! Comics!!!! Part IV: Reading Comics


A few years back, I posted three galleries of old photos of newsstands (you know, those things that sell lottery tickets and bagged snacks? They used to sell periodicals!) with montages of some of the comic books on display (click on the hey kids comics label at the bottom of this post to see them all). It was so much fun to put together, doing the detective work, assembling the images, that I wanted to keep going (honestly, one of these days I'm going to go back and add more comics to those original posts, some of the montages were a bit sparse). Sadly, I seem to have mostly tapped the well of usable newsstand pictures (insert sad face emoticon here), but here's a related sequel.

What follows is a gallery of 54 photos of people (mostly kids) reading comic books from the 1930s thru the 1980s with some of the covers of the books being devoured. The dates captioning the pictures are based on the release of the comic books, so some might be a year or few off, but they are most certainly within close range. The soldier in 1942 is reading a comic featuring the racist imagery prevalent in WWII era books that served as anti-Axis propaganda at home and abroad. Note the horrified looks of those poor, traumatized youngsters being turned into juvenile delinquents by the horror and crime comics of the mid-50s (that's sarcasm, folks). Also, that Superman fella sure seems popular.

Two of these are cheating: The 1970 photo shows kids shopping, not reading (although that was sure to come) and the final shot depicts a kid seemingly drawing his own comics, although the mountain of Bronze Age Comics on his bed certainly indicates a regular partaking of that divine diversion.

Thanks to The Grand Comics Database, the most invaluable comic book historical research site online; Richard Beland's Jungle Frolics blog; Robert Smentek; and Bart Bush of the Facebook group, Old Guys Who Like Old Comics.

Coming later this year: A sequel to this piece of comics being perused by celebrities (both in real life and in film and television).

1938

1939

1940 
1940

1941 


1942
1942

1942

1944

1944

1944

1946

1946

1947

1947

1947

1947

1947

1947

1947

1948

1948

1949

1949

1949

1950

1950

1950

1951

1951

1952 from The Adventures of Superman TV episode, "The Birthday Letter" (comic from 1951)

1952

1953

1953

1954

1954

1954

1954

1956

1957

1958

1959

1963

1970

1972

1972

1975

1976

1978

Marvel artist Billy Graham reads the 1978 Silver Surfer graphic novel (Marvel's first), surrounded by various Silver and Bronze Age Marvel Comics first issues.

1978. By now comic book stores had begun to supplant newsstands as the place where fanboys got their fix.

1979. Some say reading comics is bad for you.

1982

Bonus Photo! Aspiring artist surrounded by Bronze Age goodness.